Companies occasionally require additional talent to fill gaps in their organization or to complete a large project. There are various models that companies can use to close talent gaps and avoid burdening the rest of their staff with work. Both types are becoming increasingly popular in the IT industry. Which should you choose? Even though they are frequently confused, both are distinct models. Here’s a breakdown of both models, IT staff augmentation vs. project outsourcing, and their advantages.
An overview of IT staff augmentation
IT staff augmentation refers to using temporary employees to fill specific skill gaps in a company. Workers employed in this manner are, despite their temporary status, the company’s employees.
That sets staff augmentation apart from IT project outsourcing and other third-party staffing options. Consultants, freelancers, and contractors are great examples of staff augmentation for your firm.
Advantages of IT staff augmentation
Here are some benefits IT staff augmentation services provide to the firms.
- Staff augmentation enables a company to scale its teams based on project requirements. It is a versatile method of gaining on-demand access to talent.
- It allows temporary employees to interact directly with company employees under the same conditions.
- It is cost-effective because you only pay for the skills/talents you require at the time.
- Management controls auxiliary staff and their work than outsourcing vendors, who work independently.
An overview of the IT project outsourcing
Staff augmentation entails bringing in individuals to supplement talent needs. Whereas IT project outsourcing entails hiring an entire team to work on a specific project. When comparing staff augmentation to software outsourcing, bringing in an engineer to fill such a need in your development team would be considered staff augmentation.
Advantages of IT project outsourcing
Here are some benefits IT project outsourcing offers to businesses.
- The client company is more concerned with the result of such a project than with nitpicking minor details.
- The vendor is in charge of the entire project, from start to finish, including testing and quality assurance.
- Outsourcing necessitates relinquishing most control over the project’s workflow.
- An outsourcing vendor is responsible for the final product’s outcome and quality, whereas a staff augmentation vendor only provides skilled developers.
IT Staff Augmentation vs. Outsourcing: points to consider the right vendor
Here are some points to determine to select the right contractor.
Assess your needs
This stage influences the overall direction of the project. Clarity is vital, not only for budgeting; it is also beneficial for making decisions.
Projects with a few skill gaps and a managing team are fixed through staff augmentation. Outsourcing the software project rather than staff augmentation is often the best action for projects requiring a team and additional resources.
Regardless you use staff augmentation software or, outsourcing focus should be on quality. And if you can get that quality cheaply, that’s great. Many countries have emerged as outsourcing behemoths due to the availability of numerous skilled workers at lower costs.
A portfolio of previous projects is essential. As you evaluate their work, consider the nature of the projects to ensure that they are relevant to your field/industry. It improves adaptability if the vendor is already familiar with the nuances of your industry.
Honest reviews from the contractor’s previous clients reveal more than a portfolio. Aside from expertise, consider the contractor’s relationship with clients and the work ethic of the team members. This section answers the question, “Will you enjoy working with this vendor?”
Conclusion: Finding the right talent is critical for any business. It is always beneficial to have a plan in place before venturing out. It’s difficult to say which is superior: staff augmentation or outsourcing. For more consideration, consult IT staff augmentation services for your project.